- Tenure is a big step because
- It is a permanent position
- Rejection is devastating since the people evaluating you are the people you've been working with for the last 5-7 years
- Don't joke about tenure or the tenure process as it is a very sensitive topic
- It is a permanent position
- Differences among universities
- Some universities try to intervene early by mentoring and guiding young faculty
- A few universities (not many) exert quality control at the hiring stage, so that tenure is a formality
- Some universities try to intervene early by mentoring and guiding young faculty
- Thing to be clear on
- As you get closer to the tenure decision date, prepare yourself for rejection
- Know the rules and the procedure
- Before you even accept the position, you should have found out
- Is the process fair/unfair?
- Who has input, who doesn't?
- When does the review take place?
- Is the process fair/unfair?
- Formal rules set by American Association of University Professors (AAUP)
- Professors must be evaluated for tenure by their 8th year (this is to prevent universities from stringing junior faculty along)
- At MIT:
- After 4 years, there is a review for promotion from assistant to associate professor without tenure
- After 6 years, there is a review for promotion to associate professor with tenure
- Leaves the 7th year for finding a new job if you are rejected
- After 4 years, there is a review for promotion from assistant to associate professor without tenure
- As you get closer to the tenure decision date, prepare yourself for rejection
- How to get tenure
- Don't consciously think about getting tenure
- Keep a list of people you meet in a text file so that you can use them for references later on
- Have self-respect
- Be your own person and decide what you want to do
- Assess the university as much as it assesses you
- Use your time to do what you are excited about and build up your research group
- Live your dream!!!
- Don't consciously think about getting tenure
- Duplicity is bad and backfires
- Don't choose research directions or collaborations for the sole purpose of getting tenure (people can tell and won't like it)
- Don't try to solicit offers from other institutions in an effort to game the system (people will figure out what you are doing and get mad)
- Don't choose research directions or collaborations for the sole purpose of getting tenure (people can tell and won't like it)
- Tenure criteria
- Mainly based on research excellence
- Show that you are a leader in your field by getting your name out
- Giving review talks or writing review articles
- Giving conference talks or seminars
- To a lesser extent (depending on university), based on community service and teaching
- In terms of teaching, people are really thinking about whether you respect the students as opposed to the quality of your teaching
- Respecting students means keeping appointments, not making students feel unimportant, and grading honestly/fairly
- Emotionally, people are thinking:
- Is this a person I want to have in my department for the rest of my life?
- Is this person competent in administration and will s/he pitch in?
- Is this person going to choose good research topics and be a pioneer as opposed to just following the pack?
- Is this a person I want to have in my department for the rest of my life?
- No shortcuts or magic formula to getting tenure (the faculty don't use a checklist)
- Mainly based on research excellence
- Community service
- There are lots of jobs/committees and they (for the most part) are not fun
- Find your niche: choose a job, take it over, and do it well
- If you do the same job for a long time, it will get easier and take less time
- If you want to make yourself stick out, choose a job that is unpopular like colloquium/seminar organization or graduate admissions
- There are lots of jobs/committees and they (for the most part) are not fun
- Giving talks
- Most seminar organizers are lazy and have a hard time finding speakers so take advantage of that
- In July, email organizers and volunteer to give talks at good universities
- Advantages of seminars over conference talks
- At a conference, you are typically giving a 10-20 minute talk in a 2 hour session -- you can easily be missed
- But you have a whole day at an institution for a seminar - 1 hour for the talk, dinner and appointments
- At a conference, you are typically giving a 10-20 minute talk in a 2 hour session -- you can easily be missed
- Colloquium tenure talk
- Typically you will be asked to give a colloquium on your work in preparation for the faculty voting on you
- Make sure this colloquium is *really* accessible since it will be attended by faculty outside your field
- Communicate clearly what you did and why it was important
- Communicate clearly what students were involved and how you are connected to them (show your mentoring skills)
- Typically you will be asked to give a colloquium on your work in preparation for the faculty voting on you
- Most seminar organizers are lazy and have a hard time finding speakers so take advantage of that
- As tenure review date approaches, know your time scales and options
- Some people try to look for other offers at this time
- Only consider offers you are serious about
- Let your university know what you are doing
- Some people try to look for other offers at this time
02 November 2007
Notes on Fisher Files, Sequence II, Episode 8 - Getting Tenure
Here are my notes on the Fisher Files episode entitled "Getting tenure."
Labels:
career,
education,
fisher_files,
presentations
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment